KickAss
Gear News Archive: October 2005
October 30th
The White House
Versus the CIA
It almost sounds like a new
computer game, but it is instead, unfortunately, reality. The White House
has
been at war
with much of the CIA for over 2 years now, and the end
result is the disaster in Iraq, and an unprecedented loss in world prestige
and credibility. We also have rising resentment, and increasing terrorism
around the world, the exact opposite of what Dick Cheney, the de facto
president, told us would happen when we attacked Iraq.
What caused this internecine
fighting between the executive branch and it's intelligence agencies? Dick
Cheney, our unelected president. George Bush doesn't know enough, or care
enough about anything to be president, which is perfect for Dick, who hates
to be in the spotlight.
Scooter Libby took the fall for
Dick Cheney, there is no doubt about it. Cheney ordered Libby to go after
Joe Wilson and his wife. This gives Cheney "deniability". The charges
against Libby don't get to the the heart of the matter; the leaking of a
covert CIA agent's identity to the press. That is because the players in
this game all continued to lie to the grand jury. Judy "Little Miss Run
Amok" Miller said she couldn't remember who told her. Let's hope she now
becomes "Little Miss Run Out of Town". She should never be allowed to work
at any news organization for the rest of her life.
The reason Scooter was only
charged with obstruction, perjury and lying is because everyone at the heart
of the case refuses to tell what they know; they conveniently "forgot".
I'll make a prediction. Scooter
will bellow and yell that he is innocent right up until the time he pleads
guilty to a lesser charge. If Cheney and Co. have to get up in front of a
jury and lie again, there will be a chance that they will get caught up by
an email or note in the prosecutor's hands. They can't afford to let this
come to trial, and they will go for some type of plea bargain that keeps
Scooter out of jail. But I also predict that if the Democrats take control
of the House in 2006, there will be hearings into the false intelligence
used by Cheney to justify his war. This isn't going away, even though the
Republicans still think they can silence all of their critics.
All of this comes from the fact
that Cheney was going to take us to war, no matter what. When the CIA gave
Cheney intelligence he didn't like, he would say "wrong answer", and tell
them to do it again. The resultant erosion of trust and respect between the
White House and the CIA, which was eventually destroyed by the Plame affair,
has ill served the American people. You can thank Dick Cheney for all of the
problems the country finds itself facing now, and some day, he will be held
accountable.
Dr.
John
October 27th
Spilt Beans in a
House of Cards
The Special Prosecutor in the
White House CIA leak case has been talking to many people. It appears that
some of them may have spilt the beans, so to speak, on the perpetrators of
the leak within the Bush administration.
The frustrating part for the
White House is that in the past, they have been able to come down on the
bean spillers like a ton of bricks, thus keeping a lid on the story. For
example, when Paul O'Neill, the Secretary of Treasury, was critical of the
White House economic policies and how they were formulated, he was charged
with leaking classified information, and was "investigated".
We all know what happened when Joe Wilson publicly said that Iraq had not
tried to acquire uranium from Niger. The White House was not used to letting
people get away with criticizing them.
Normally, Dick Cheney could just
pick up a phone, and inflict pain at a distance. But now, they have no
choice but to sit and wait. They have no control over the Grand Jury hearing
the case, and no control over the prosecutor. For once, they are helpless to
smear or intimidate the bean spillers.
Some of the bean spillers are in
fascinating
positions to create havoc if they tell all that they know. One such
person is Susan B. Ralston, who works as Karl Rove's chief assistant. In a
bizarre twist of irony, Ms. Ralston also worked for Jack Abramoff, who is
connected with Tom Delay, and is currently under investigation in a case
that even involves murder. Ms. Ralston has testified in both investigations.
What I am wondering is how many
other potential bean spillers are out there who know about the many details
of the criminal activities in the Bush administration and the Republican
controlled congress. Now that the Bush house of cards is teetering on
collapse, and their ability to crush dissent is diminished, I can only hope
that more bean spillers will help turn a hill of beans into the downfall of
the Bush regime.
Dr.
John
October 26th
(mp3 audio version)
Why It Matters
As the Special Prosecutor
prepares to conclude the Grand Jury looking into the CIA leak, the
question of indictments looms large over a wary White House. Despite the
Republican noise machine's constant din to the contrary, any indictments
that might be handed up in this case are critically important for our
Democracy. This case is about the reasons for going to war, not about
politics.
The Republican spin meisters have
been floating trial balloons all week to see which ones might resonate with
what little of the public remains behind George Bush and Company. The most
amusing was Senator Hutchinson's suggestion that perjury was a
"technicality", not a crime. That is the exact opposite of what she
said when it was Bill Clinton who was accused of perjury, of course. No
honor, no shame.
We know now that there is at
least one, and possibly two indictments that will be put on the court
docket, meaning that there will be trials coming up sometime in the future.
We don't know how high up the indictments will go, but everyone doubts they
will go above the level of Chief of Staff. They are important nonetheless.
People who broke the law to justify an illegal war in Iraq will be held
accountable for at least one thing; their conspiracy to cover up their lies
and smear campaigns that were used to maintain support for the war.
When applied to the White House,
there is nothing I can think of that fits the definition of "high crimes"
more than deceiving the American people about the need for going to war.
Many people have been killed, our national credibility is in shambles, our
national debt has been dramatically inflated, and the Middle East is more
unstable and chaotic, rather than more democratic and peaceful.
George Bush and Company said they
were going to bring honor and dignity back to the White House. They sure
have a funny way of going about it.
Dr.
John
October 25th
(mp3 audio version)
The Fall of the
Fourth Estate
The corporate-controlled media
organizations that are charged with the constitutional duty of
government and corporation watchdog have instead joined forces with those
same power brokers to reshape our country. A sickening entwinement of
corporations and their lobbyists working hand in hand with legislators to
write pro-corporate, anti-consumer legislation is joined by corporate-owned
media outlets that extol the virtues of every nefarious collusion to an
unwitting public. The journalistic profession is said to be "The Fourth
Estate"; acting to compliment the three branches of government with
additional checks and balances on those in power.
But as our corrupted political
system flees from Democracy and plunges toward Corporateocracy, the Fourth
Estate has been co-opted by the very same powerful people that are
supposed to be the subject of media scrutiny. Indeed, the major media
outlets, from cable TV news to the NY Times, have now become un-indicted
co-conspirators in the cabal that blurs the lines between government and
corporations. The media have
become part of the problem, rather than part of the solution.
As they have colluded to keep the
public misinformed on important issues such as the reasons for going to war,
the plummeting pole numbers for the Bush administration have been mirrored
by the crumbling public confidence in U.S. journalism. The government and
media are chained together at the ankles now, and will sink or swim together
in the eyes of the weary public. The watchdogs can't easily turn on their
current masters, lest they expose their previous journalistic malfeasance to
scrutiny, further eroding their own credibility.
Because major media outlets have
been cheerleaders for an illegal war, unwise tax cuts and the chipping away
of civil liberties, they are in no position to right the wrongs that they
helped perpetrate. Two thousand brave young soldiers killed in Iraq, and no
outrage from the media about the lies that led us here. Such is our fate
after the Fall of the Fourth Estate.
Dr.
John
October 24th
The Ever Shifting
Bar
The Congress investigated
everything Bill Clinton and his administration did. They lowered the bar on
what constituted an investigateable action so far, that an official could
get investigated for taking tickets to a game. Mr. Clinton himself was
investigated for a land deal he personally had nothing to do with, which
occurred 10 years before he became President. How did this happen, and how
did the bar get lowered so far?
Republicans controlled Congress,
and decided to use investigations as political attack tools, rather than as
a means to investigate political malfeasance. So in fact, they were not
lowering the bar, they were tossing it out altogether. They removed any bar
to investigation of the Clinton administration. They could get away with it
because they controlled the means to initiate and prosecute any
investigation. They also knew that once Dubya the Dunce was in office, and
Dick and Don were running the show, that Republicans could get away with
anything, because now the bar would be raised so high again, that no crime
was sufficient to initiate an investigation.
If we look at the list of high
crimes and misdemeanors that should be investigated, and would have been
investigated by the very same Republican Congress under Clinton, it is clear
that our government has become totally corrupt. Some of the offenses on the
list that should be investigated include:
1) Investigation into false
intelligence used to justify an illegal war.
2) Investigation into the
dismantling of FEMA, and the total irresponsibility of its officials during
hurricane Katrina.
3) The second 9/11 investigation
that was promised, but never initiated.
4) The complete mismanagement in
creating, staffing and management of Homeland Security.
5) The investigation into which
high level officials in the Defense Dept. ordered torture as part of
prisoner interrogation.
6) Investigations into the
billions of taxpayer dollars that went missing in Iraq, and the corruption
in Defense Dept. procurement.
7) Investigation into the lack of
equipment for troops on the ground in Iraq.
Currently, only the CIA leak is
being seriously investigated. Tom Delay has been indicted by a Texas
prosecutor, and the SEC is looking into Bill Frist's illegal sale of stock
that he claimed he never had, and which was supposed to be in a blind trust.
The Republicans that lowered, and
then threw out the bar for what rises to the level of "investigateable"
under Clinton have now raised the bar so high again that most Republican
criminals can relax, and laugh at the whole situation. Notice that the same
Republicans that used investigations to politically attack President Clinton
at every turn now say "don't play the blame game" whenever anyone suggests
government malfeasance. If that fails, they viciously attack any reporter or
person who challenges them, or the rare prosecutor that is actually assigned
to a case.
Next time you hear someone say,
"don't play the blame game", you can assume two things: they are a
Republican, and they are guilty.
Dr.
John
October 23rd
Two Years Too Late;
NY Times Figures It Out
The 'Newspaper of Record', the NY
Times, has finally decided to stop being George's lap dog, and has started
printing some very damaging information. Of course, if they had assigned any
other reporter besides Megaphone Miller to the WMD case, they would have
figured out 2 years ago, like most of the rest of us, that the
administration lied us into a very unwise war without a plan for exit.
The Times also seems to have
finally figured out that George is and has been a puppet of the
Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal in the administration. Colin Powell's former chief of
staff gave a
speech saying that Bush was not interested in foreign affairs, and that
Cheney and Rumsfeld, along with people like Wolfowitz and Libby, were the
ones that led us to war on false pretences. George was mainly on vacation or
bike riding. It was also Cheney's office that leaked the name of CIA agent
Valerie Plame.
The Republicans and the staff at
the NY Times will all have to live with the fact that they were involved in
so many people being killed, and so much money being wasted, and so
much good will around the world being squandered. Hope all you Republicans
are happy with your "team", as you seem to think of this dysfunctional bunch
of war criminals.
Dr.
John
October 22nd
Saturday Night
Massacre Version 2.0?
If Patrick Fitzgerald attempts to
indict Dick Cheney, and/or charge President Bush as an un-indicted
co-conspirator in the CIA leak case, will George Bush fire the Special
Prosecutor as Richard Nixon had Robert Bork do in 1973? That is the question
being asked now by ex-CIA analyst
Ray McGovern. Mr. McGovern says that there is probably enough evidence
to take down Dick Cheney, the guy who has actually been running the country
for the last 5 years. But if Dubya is named in the conspiracy to smear Joe
Wilson and then cover up who leaked Valerie Plame's name to the press,
McGovern fears there will be a rapid response to have Alberto Gonzales act
as the modern day version of Robert Bork, and remove Fitzgerald from the
case.
Yesterday, Fitzgerald's office
posted a
new
website with information on the case, a sure sign that things are coming
to a conclusion.
One thing is clear to me after
reading about this case for over 2 years. Cheney was
behind it all, with
Scooter and Turd acting as hatchet men. Further, it is clear that the
tactics they used put them at serious odds with the entire intelligence
community, especially the CIA. You can't run foreign policy if you've pissed
off your eyes and ears around the world, but that's exactly what Slick Dick
did. Remember, Dick was the one who ignored all the information from the CIA
and Joe Wilson that their story about uranium from Africa was bogus. Dick
made sure that the infamous 16 words were in the President's State of the
Union Address, and then when it was found to be suspect, Dick and Co.
pointed their fingers at the CIA and said "it was their fault, they gave us
bad intelligence".
Dick sure knows how to make
friends at the agency. Well, now it is all coming back to bite him in the
butt, and it looks like the chicken-hawk neocon war cult may finally get
called on their treasonous actions. So my question is: will Alberto Gonzales
be called on to fire Patrick Fitzgerald, or will they bring Robert Bork out
of retirement to reprise his role in the Saturday Night Massacre?
Dr.
John
October 21st
New NVidia Graphics
Drivers
NVidia has released new WHQL
certified drivers for GeForce cards, and the new drivers do offer additional
performance. A quick check with my dual GeForce 7800 SLI setup showed an
increase in 3D Mark 2005 of approx 800 to 900 points, and in 3D Mark 2003 of
about 3000 points. You can get the new drivers
here.
Dr.
John
October 19th
My Printer Spied on
Me
If you own certain newer color
laser printers, you might be correct in assuming that your printed documents
will always
point
back to you personally. According to one of my favorite organizations,
the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), many color laser printers put a
tiny series of yellow dots near the edge of all printed documents, and this
code contains the date that the document was printed, and the printer's
serial number. The code is only supposed to be readable by the CIA, who
worked with printer companies secretly to install the spying system. But now
the EFF has decoded some of the dots, and has posted a
link
with all of the printer models so far discovered to have the spying system
installed.
The good news is that so far,
only color laser printers have the spy system, suggesting that
counterfeiting was the primary concern of the CIA. If they wanted to track
every document ever printed, this would be in all types of printers, not
just color laser printers.
I Want All
Politician's Brains Scanned... NOW!
Especially the Republicans in
charge of botching everything over the last few years, and who lied us into
war in Iraq. Why? Because scientists have just used magnetic resonance
imaging to
show
that pathological liars have 21% to 26% more white matter in their
prefrontal cortex than normal people do. This is exactly the opposite of
autistic people, who have more grey matter than normal people.
What the hell are white matter
and grey matter? Those describe the two major types of brain tissue; grey
matter is packed full of neurons which are responsible for processing and
generating information. White matter contains neuron fibers (axons) that
transfer signals from one part of the brain to other parts. The scientists
don't know why extra white matter might be associated with pathological
lying, but my guess (as a neuroscientist who specializes in white matter) is
that there may be too many fiber connections, and that some are not normal.
The brain of an infant has many more nerve fiber connections than are
needed. A major part of brain development involves the selective pruning of
improper connections in the brain, so that the final circuitry works as well
as possible. If that process is interrupted or faulty, improper connections
could remain into adulthood, resulting in personality disorders such as
pathological lying.
So I reiterate; I want all
politicians brains scanned right now. Anyone with 20% excess white matter or
more in the prefrontal cortex should be given a pink slip, or at the very
least, sent to work in Dick Cheney's office, where we at least know everyone
lies.
Dr.
John
October 18th
A Bolder Approach
Condi “mushroom cloud” Rice loves
to connect the war in Iraq with the terrorist attacks in 2001. Can’t you
hear her in your head saying; “We don’t want the wakeup call to be a
mushroom cloud”? But of course there was no connection between terrorism and
Iraq. Now Condi has taken up the extremely tired refrain “we have to fight
them there, so we don’t have to fight them here”. One thing you can count on
from Condi is she doesn’t stray far from the Republican’s daily talking
points, and she loves to use their quaint little sayings.
But I have to wonder if her interview on a Sunday talk show might not have
been scripted for her by beleaguered Karl Rove. Condi admitted that we could
have just gone after the terrorists that actually attacked the US. But she
said that the Bush administration decided to take: “A Bolder Approach… to
change the Middle East”. Bolder? Perhaps; in the way General Custer was bold
at the Little Big Horn, or the way Icarus flew too high on his wings of
feather and wax.
“A bolder approach”. It kind of sticks in your throat when you think about
what has, and is transpiring in Iraq. But Condi had one thing right; we
actually are bringing the Republican form of democracy to Iraq, as it
becomes clear that ballot stuffing may have been rampant in the recent
constitutional vote there.
Dr.
John
The Un-United States
George Bush says he is a uniter,
not a divider. He has pursued that goal just as incompetently as he has led
our country to war, and spent us into a massive deficit, while all along
dismantling the federal government at all levels. Just as his war in Iraq
has made the world less safe, and his dismantling of government has made the
U.S. less safe, his divisive governance of the country has left it
politically divided more than any other time in my lifetime.
Democrats and Republicans in Congress hardly even speak to one another
anymore, except through biting sound bites on TV. The electorate is
viciously split along party lines, and talk radio is totally polarized. Now,
even the Republicans in congress have split along religious and corporate
lines over the nomination of Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court.
As multiple investigations close in on powerful Republicans throughout the
government, the GOP will no doubt accelerate the in-fighting, with some
Republicans defending those under investigation or indictment, and others
moving to distance themselves from the meltdown. Once the Republican
divisiveness-machine crumbles, we can only hope that the survivors and the
electorate will try to heal the artificial wounds to the Nation that these
corrupt politicians have wrought. It’s time to reunite the Un-United States.
Dr.
John
October 16th
Wink Wink; Nudge
Nudge
Judy Miller is
talking, but the edification of the public remains elusive. I have
questions.
1) Why did Judy go to jail when she had a waiver from Scooter?
2) Why was defending Judy “excruciatingly difficult”
according to two editors at the NY Times?
3) Why did Scooter ask Judy to lie in their second interview, by asking
her to say she got the information about Joe Wilson’s wife from “a former
Hill staffer”, rather than the real source – the Vice President’s chief of
staff?
I suggest that the answers to all of these questions get to the heart of the
how this entire fiasco could have happened at the NY Times. Judy said she
stayed in jail for 3 months to “protect journalism’s confidential sources”.
But even Scooter Libby and his lawyer say they gave Judy a
“get-out-of-jail-free” card a year ago, long before she went to jail for
contempt of court. What was Judy thinking? She was thinking that she was
getting winks and nudges from Scooter and counsel. Publicly, they were
saying “of course testify”, but she said she was sure that she was getting
winks and nudges that seemed to indicate that Scooter and counsel did NOT
want her to testify. Only when Scooter called her personally, and told her
it was OK to testify, did Judy agree to cooperate with the special
prosecutor.
This fact alone should be very troubling to the public, and alarming to the
NY Times' staff. Judy, and by association the NY Times, were not protecting
confidential sources, they were protecting their private connections to the
very core of the White House. They were not protecting a “whistle blower”,
they were covering their rears, and protecting their exclusive contacts with
the highest echelons of the administration. Clearly, the NY Times editors
and staff know the difference between a whistle blower, and a propagandist.
So the big question is why they can’t say so in public.
Just for the record, a CIA agent, let’s say Mark Felt, telling a reporter a
fact that the administration does not want people to know is the classical
example of a “whistle blower”. But the definition of a whistle blower is
diametrically the opposite of the Vice President’s or President’s chief of
staff telling a reporter a falsehood that they hope will be reported as
fact, in order to support a war being prosecuted on political grounds. This
fact remained
unreported in all of the lengthy non-mea culpas printed by the NY Times
today, and is clearly the grudging little fact that they still refuse to
deal with.
Dr.
John
October 14th
Samsung WAS Guilty
Many years ago,
I was writing news posts about the absurdly high prices attained by SDRAM
memory modules at a time when all other computer parts were dropping in
price. At one point, we were paying over $600 for a 256MB stick of RAM.
Compare that with about $70 now, a nearly 10 fold drop.
I and many
others speculated back then that some price fixing hanky panky was going on,
and now Samsung has
admitted such, and has been dealt a $300 million fine as punishment. Of
course that money will probably never make it back to the bilked customers,
or the PC shops that were hammered with hiked prices. I for one would love
to see a class action lawsuit leveled against the memory industry to
compensate the many injured parties.
Dr.
John
October 13th
Will They All Get
Off Scott Free?
A Republican
friend of mine says that all the Republicans currently under investigation
or indictment will get away with their crimes without justice being served.
Considering that Republicans control almost all of the governmental
instruments which initiate and prosecute political investigations,
there is at least a chance that some of these investigations may fade away
without indictments.
What I don't
see at all, in great contrast to how Republicans behaved during Bill
Clinton's Presidency, is a Democratic attack on the targets of these
investigations, or any gloating by Democrats about the Republican party
meltdown. Most Democrats are simply too cautious, as usual, to add
their two cents.
The split
between evangelical and corporate conservatives is widening, and this is a
greater threat to Republican ambitions than any Democratic countermovement
could ever be. Whether the Democrats can regain their voice, and offer clear
alternatives to the culture of corruption and cronyism that the Republicans
have given us is still a matter of question. My guess is that the Democrats
will gain seats, but will not regain control of either the House or Senate
in 2006, even though that would be the best hope for stemming the tide of
Republican mal-governance before even more irreparable mistakes are made.
Dr.
John
October 12th
The Real Slick
Willy
Republicans
used to call Bill Clinton, their favorite whipping boy, “Slick Willy” to
intimate that he was corrupt. That of course turned out to be nonsense, and
not one charge stuck to President Clinton except the perjury charge in the
Monica Lewinski saga. But the Republicans in the White House have been busy
for almost 6 years now building their scandal portfolios as profoundly as
they have padded their stock portfolios. The two are inextricably linked.
Take Dick “soon-to-be-indicted” Cheney, for example. He has been reaping
huge rewards from his “no-bid-contract” Halliburton stocks while all the
time shaping US military policy to enrich both Halliburton, and himself.
Slick Dick maintains that he has no conflict of interest. This is a huge
scandal, in part because of the total silence from the major media on
obvious conflicts of interest in the Vice President’s Office, and the
connections to war profiteering.
Of course there are also huge scandals swirling around fake intelligence
used to justify an illegal war, about nominating a super-crony for the
Supreme Court, and around the treasonous CIA outing by the White House. Some
of these should be coming to a climax soon.
We are now learning more about the real “Slick Willy” scandal in the US
Senate. Senate Majority Leader Bill “Slick Willy” Frist is far more corrupt
than 100 Bill Clintons put together, and his leadership tenure may be coming
to and end, just as Tom Delay’s recently has. Bill Frist has gone to a whole
new level of congressional corruption by keeping track of all his stock in
his own family’s company, while it was in a supposed blind trust, and
selling it all right before the stock price plummeted.
Now we find out
that Slick Willy had his brother, the CEO of the family hospital company,
hold onto additional stock for him, and also had that stock sold when he got
insider information (from his brother/CEO). We are talking millions of
dollars worth in conflict of interest, while Slick Willy oversaw tons of
health care legislation that benefited his family company. Compare this with
a $30,000 land deal done by a friend of Bill Clinton’s 10 years before he
was President. That was called White Water, and it hounded Bill Clinton for
years. Republicans still attack Bill Clinton to this day; they really miss
their favorite whipping boy.
So, will the REAL Slick Willy please stand up, (and please go to jail - do
not pass go, and do not collect $200). Don’t worry, Martha kept a cell warm
for you.
Dr.
John
October 11th
What's a Crony?
The synonyms
for Crony include chum, buddy, pal, and sidekick. With that in mind, ask
yourself how much independence of thought will Harriet Miers bring to the
Supreme Court? We have no idea, but from what we do know, it seems likely
that she will be in George's back pocket. If we look at the evidence
available so far, Miers is an unabashed Bush fanatic. In correspondence to
George, she has actually used phrases such as "You are the greatest!", and
other such suck-up phases that make it obvious she is a yes-woman, always
trying to flatter the boss. We also know she has been George's lawyer
for years, and has been in charge of keeping his AWOL and drunk driving
charges out of the news.
Harriet Miers
is not only a less-than-independent thinker, she is a Bush groupie of the
highest order. How would this fact affect her performance on the court?
First of all, there are many issues of presidential prerogative that will
come before the court, including the never-ending detention of terrorist
suspects without charges or access to lawyers. Further, it is even possible
that Bush and company may face charges in several different ongoing
investigations, including the Fitzgerald investigation into the White House
CIA leak. How independent would Miers be if confronted with an appeal of
such a case?
Miers is much
like other Bush appointees and nominees, just the right mix of loyalty and
compliance, while not having enough background or expertise to make her own
decisions.
The Bush
dynasty has had too much political power in this country for the last
several decades, and in my opinion, it is time for that stranglehold to be
broken. Having Harriet Miers on the highest court for the next 20 years will
ensure that the dynasty will continue to wield unwarranted political power
for a long time to come.
When it comes
to describing the pitfalls of cronyism in the appointment of Supreme Court
Justices, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 76:
"To what purpose then require the co-operation of the Senate? I answer, that
the necessity of their concurrence would have a powerful, though, in
general, a silent operation. It would be an excellent check upon a spirit of
favoritism in the President, and would tend greatly to prevent the
appointment of unfit characters from State prejudice, from family
connection, from personal attachment, or from a view to popularity. . . . He
would be both ashamed and afraid to bring forward, for the most
distinguished or lucrative stations, candidates who had no other merit than
that of coming from the same State to which he particularly belonged, or of
being in some way or other personally allied to him, or of possessing the
necessary insignificance and pliancy to render them the obsequious
instruments of his pleasure."
Thanks Alex;
that's what I call a truly strict constructionist.
Dr.
John
Sony Cameras Have
Faulty CCD Chips
A very
disturbing
announcement from Sony describes a flaw in many of their digital camera
and camcorder CCD chips, the chips that record the image. The chips were
apparently made with an epoxy that is susceptible to moisture, and when the
seals fail, the image becomes cloudy, or fails altogether. Many models of
Sony cameras and camcorders manufactured between October 2002 through March
2004 have this problem. Also, many other camera makers, including
Cannon,
Konica-Minolta and
Fuji, use the same chips.
Sony is
promising to replace the chips at no charge, which is certainly appropriate
considering the prices on some of these cameras and camcorders.
Dr.
John
Intel's Attempts at
Dual Core Fizzle
Intel did an
"on-paper"
release
of new processors based on the so-called Paxville core, but few if any chips
could be found anywhere on the web. Not that many folks will actually want
these things anyway, because rather than being a fully redesigned dual-core
processor like AMD's X2 chips, Intel simply slapped two P4's together with
an MCM bridge, and added extra cache. Very Intel in execution, and very
unimpressive to boot. I guess that means AMD has another year to kick Intel
while it's down.
IBM Drops Case
Against SCO
IBM is getting
very tired of SCO's attempts to stall the legal case over Linux/Unix in
court. Noting that SCO is almost out of cash, and couldn't pay any
settlements anyway, IBM decided to speed the litigation proceedings up by
dropping
all counter charges against SCO. Now SCO will basically not have any more
excuses to delay the case, and that means we should have a ruling much
sooner.
SCO hasn't got
a chance.
October 7th
Bush Admits Torture
is Part of US Toolkit
Republicans
tried for 8 years to scandalize the Clinton administration, and failed
miserably because there weren’t any scandals of significance. George Bush
has been far more successful at creating real scandals in the White House,
from altering intelligence reports to support an unnecessary war, to
revealing the name of a CIA agent, and compromising all of her contacts
overseas. But one of the most insidious scandals has been simmering below
the surface of the larger swirling scandals; the torture and murder of
prisoners held by the US. Only low level soldiers have taken the fall for
this despicable chapter in US history, but the orders came from the top,
despite administration denials.
How do we know
this for sure? Well, of course there were all those memos, including the one
about “taking the gloves off”, and the one about “Gitmo-izing” Abu Graib.
But now we have confirmation from the White House that torture not only was
sanctioned at the top, but that they still want to be able to torture
prisoners if they think it will get them information. This confirmation came
in the form of a White House threat to
veto the Defense Authorization Bill in Congress that has an amendment
added by John McCain which would explicitly prohibit any form of torture
being used on any persons held in US custody. This would be the first and
only veto from Mr. Bush, and the threat is directed straight at the
no-more-torture statute. That means that the White House is willing to kill
an entire defense spending bill for one amendment that prohibits torture by
US soldiers and officials.
So there you
have it, not only did the orders to torture detainees come from the top,
including Bush and Rumsfeld, but they are so fond of this technique, they
are going to fight to retain it despite 90 out of 100 Senators voting for
the amendment. That is a huge, veto-proof margin.
Dr.
John
October 5th
Are You Ready for
High Def DVD? No You're Not
I'll just start with
the
bad news right up front. Most existing monitors and HDTVs will not
support the copy protection scheme in new high definition disks, so when you
try to play them, you will see a message that your "monitor is revoked".
That means you'll have to replace your monitor/TV when you buy a high
definition DVD player.
Could it get any worse?
Oh yes. On your computer, high definition DVD players will not work with
Windows XP, they will only work with Windows Vista. Notice that this means
that there won't be any HD-DVD drives for computers until late 2006 (a year
away), because that is the most optimistic estimate of when the new version
of Windows will be out.
So let's recap; you
need a new computer monitor, a new HDTV, a new computer HD-DVD drive, and a
new HD-DVD player for your TV, and you'll need to upgrade to Windows Vista.
My recommendation is
for everyone to stop buying any more computer hardware or high def TVs for the next year.
None - unless something breaks. Anything you buy today will be obsolete in a
year, and will need to be replaced again.
My guess is that all of
the layers of protection they are putting into HD-DVD enabled systems may
have many unpleasant side-effects, including blocking some legal content,
and slowing system performance significantly.
You can thank copy
protection for all of this.
Dr.
John
Believing Your Own
Lies
An ancient curse
condemns liars to the unfortunate fate of beginning to believe their own
lies. This precise fate seems to have befallen the Republicans running our
country. In an
article written by Cindy Sheehan, she describes discussing the Iraq war
with several Republican Senators. When she asked them when the occupation of
Iraq would end, they said it was a "liberation". When asked why we were in
Iraq, they said "we need to fight them there, so we don't have to fight them
here".
They obviously studied
their Republican talking points well, but my question is, do these people
actually believe what they are saying, or are they pontificating simply to
drum up public support? George Bush constantly states the opposite of the
factual situation, for example when he says things are getting better in
Iraq, or when he says "we are winning the war on terrorism". But the
emphatic nature of their proclamations seem to indicate that they have
repeated the lies so many times that they are beginning to believe them. The
really disturbing part is that this is not a curse on Mr. Bush, it's a curse
on America, Iraq, and the world.
Dr.
John
October 4th
George in
Wonderland
Toto; we're not in
Texas anymore! I wish someone would remind George that he's not in Texas,
he's in the big league now, when he F's up, he can monkey-wrench the
economy, or if he really blows it, lots of people might die. Today, Mr. Bush
had a rare news conference where he actually answered questions for a
change. When queried about the readiness of Iraqi troops after more than 2
years of training, George in Wonderland said that the Iraqis were
progressing well, and that there were 30 battalions ready for combat. But
General Abizaid, who is in charge of the Iraqi war, said there was
only one combat ready Iraqi battalion. That works out to a whopping 750
combat ready Iraqi troops.
Then when asked if
George in Wonderland's newest pick for the Supreme Court was "the best
candidate for the job", he said "yes", despite the fact that the nominee has
never had any experience in constitutional law, and has never been a judge.
What she has been is Mr. Bush's personal lawyer, and the person in charge of
expunging George's records of any untoward references, such as a drunk
driving incident. George in Wonderland proclaimed prophetically, "I know
her, and she will not change". I wonder how he can know that, unless they
did a pre-nomination lobotomy on her.
Finally, George in
Wonderland said that we would win in Iraq, and that Iraq would become a free
and democratic country, and an ally in the "war on terrorism". That's not
Wonderland, that's just plain nuts.
Dr.
John
October 3rd
Bush's Lawyer
Nominated for Supreme Court
Sounds like one of
those gag headlines, doesn't it? Alas, it is another example of Bush making
political appointments and nominations, rather than seriously considering
qualifications and experience. So what is the nominee's experience that
qualifies her to be a justice on
the Supreme Court? She has never been a judge, she's just George's lawyer.
Damn, I don't even have
to ridicule this one, it's ridiculous all on it's own.
Dr.
John
Got Propaganda?
It's the American Way.
The US General
Accounting Office, at the
request of pesky Democrats, looked into the allegations that the Bush
administration used taxpayer dollars to produce pro-administration
propaganda, disguised as news. Their findings? That the Bush administration
broke the law that forbids the use of government funds for use in the
production or dissemination of propaganda.
You probably didn't
hear too much about this report in the "news"; for example, you won't find
this story in the NY Times today. They posted an
article on Friday, and another on
Saturday, but nothing today. Why? Because the Bush administration has
insisted to all government departments that bad news be released on Friday
afternoon only. That way, it might make the Saturday paper, but will be lost
in the news cycle by Monday.
My take on all of this
is simple; you don't spend money to produce and disseminate propaganda
unless your track record is bad... or abysmal. If you have been working hard
at the people's business, and you are accomplishing good things for the
populace, then you can let the news come out all by itself. On the other
hand, if you are incompetent, and keep making major, disastrous mistakes, or
are pushing programs that would never pass public scrutiny, then you really
need a good propaganda campaign to carry you through.
I wonder what
Republicans think of the use of taxpayers dollars for propaganda purposes in
America. Do you think they might complain more if it were Clinton caught
doing this?
Naaaa! That would
suggest that they were disingenuous hypocrites, and we all know that can't
be true.
Dr.
John
Copyright
2005, KickAss Gear
|